|
|
Post by HeavyMetal on Dec 4, 2006 11:29:31 GMT -5
rather then a bunch of guys whos jeeps cant go past 80 on a highway anyway. hey hey hey heey hey hey now justin and i know my jeep can go 100 ;D |
|
Eskimo
Forum User
Member #15
Posts: 1,321
|
Post by Eskimo on Dec 4, 2006 11:31:05 GMT -5
yes the hell it can lol
|
|
heapxj
 
Member #27
You Can Feel Good About Hood.
Posts: 1,082
|
Post by heapxj on Dec 4, 2006 11:42:36 GMT -5
Is this why you run stock wheels? We have a friend with a rig like that. We call it the " Wide-trac", hehe actually i ran like this for 2 weeks 35x12.5 on 2.75 backspacing  |
|
|
|
Post by HeavyMetal on Dec 4, 2006 11:53:21 GMT -5
well i run the oem wheels cuz i like how they look, and i have 2" spacers on my axles right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Queery Adams on Dec 4, 2006 18:30:58 GMT -5
a dana 60 is not too big for a 35.
lots of people do it.
Dana 44s are also run in buggies.
and i have fullwidth axles. haha
Will if you wanna do a worthy and by worthy i mean really playin for keeps swap
narrow a 1 ton axle.
its not that unreasonable.
On that note im gonna agree with heap xj and say go all out
But you know me.
|
|
|
|
Post by trumbulljeeper on Dec 4, 2006 18:42:12 GMT -5
for wills plans for his jeep, 44s F&R will be all he ever needs, so going "full out" doesnt apply to him, and if that were the case why doesnt everyone go 14bolt rears and chromolied 60 fronts w/ full hydro-steering and 44'' TSLs on a triple triangulated coilover suspension..... not only buggies run full widths,
and Will just cuz your speedo says 100 doesnt mean its really going 100,
|
|
|
|
Post by HeavyMetal on Dec 4, 2006 18:44:35 GMT -5
and Will just cuz your speedo says 100 doesnt mean its really going 100, thanks professor so 95 fact is im not playing for axle keeps right now, so a 1 ton axle would be useless for me to blow money on. im not doing anything with my rear a 1 ton front would cost (relatively) a fortune for me. and setting both up would cost another fortune i think what i wanna do or what i have now is a reasonable and perfectly fine setup for my type of (non hardcore) wheeling. nothing like corey or jeffs build will take place with my jeep until i have both a truck and trailer in the relatively distant future...just isnt part of the forseeable plan, so yes mike is correct |
|
|
|
Post by Queery Adams on Dec 4, 2006 19:33:15 GMT -5
the only thing i disagree with is that a 1 ton axle would be useless to you
im not even trying to convince you or any crap
but dana 60s would be Very usefull under your truck
even as a dd
|
|
|
|
Post by HeavyMetal on Dec 4, 2006 20:05:39 GMT -5
well i didnt mean useless so to speak, but useless for a cost point of view. i cant afford it at all. the front 44 is even pushin it
i can dream though lol
|
|
|
|
Post by trumbulljeeper on Dec 4, 2006 20:45:01 GMT -5
Will dreams about dana44s!!!! hahahahaha.... i dream about carburators =  |
|
|
|
Post by HeavyMetal on Dec 4, 2006 20:52:26 GMT -5
dreaming was referring to 60s though  |
|
|
|
Post by Queery Adams on Dec 5, 2006 16:29:30 GMT -5
did someone say sweedish bitches??!!
|
|
